My teacher colleague David Perrin has written an article at The Atlantic about what Mark Twain would have thought of the dubious pedagogy and devious process of the ongoing Common Core curricular debacle. My favorite point:
Ten years later, in Following the Equator, Twain compared the instructional methods in American asylums for the “deaf and dumb and blind children” to those used routinely in Indian universities and American public schools. As a friend of Helen Keller and a champion of her education, Twain was familiar with the methods of asylums; he’d convinced his friend H.H. Rogers to finance her schooling at Radcliffe in 1896. In Following the Equator, he chastises public schools for emphasizing rote learning and teaching “things, not the meaning of them.” He applauds the “rational” and student-centered methods of the asylums, where the teacher “exactly measures the child’s capacity” and “tasks keep pace with the child’s progress, they don’t jump miles and leagues ahead of it by irrational caprice and land in vacancy—according to the average public-school plan.” In contrast, Twain quips, “In Brooklyn, as in India, they examine a pupil, and when they find out he doesn’t know anything, they put him into literature, or geometry, or astronomy, or government, or something like that, so that he can properly display the assification of the whole system.”
While listening to a recent “Fresh Air” broadcast about the history of government surveillance, which mentioned some of the numerous attempts to gather digital information in ostensibly trying to prevent another terrorist attack, I thought about this post at The Atlantic that points out that in the interval of 1999 to 2010,
terrorists killed roughly 3,000 people in the United States. And in that interval,
roughly 360,000 were killed by guns (actually, the figure the CDC gives is 364,483 — in other words, by rounding, I just elided more gun deaths than there were total terrorism deaths).
roughly 150,000 were killed in drunk-driving accidents.
So, the surveillance programs are focused on a threat that is responsible for far fewer deaths than the rather mundane, always-with-us problems of gun violence and drunk-driving.
But I suspect that all the government and private-contractor employees — presumably, smart, ambitious people — are involved in intelligence work because, well, it’s intellectually engaging, technologically challenging work. Analysts get to look at evidence and try to find killers before they strike again — it’s a mystery show! It’s interesting, perhaps in a way that fighting these boring-but-deadly problems isn’t, but it seems a situation reminiscent of a Monty Python sketch:
“More apparatus please, nurse … the E.E.G, the B.P. monitor, and the A.V.V.” “And get the machine that goes ‘ping.'” “And get the most expensive machine in case the administrator comes.”
Posted in Comic silliness, Links, Nonfiction
Tagged bing, causes of death, death, Fresh Air, Monty Python, ping, risk, surveillance, The Atlantic